// OPEN INTELLIGENCE — PUBLIC ARCHIVECASE FILE · THE RECORD
FRFRFR
← THE ARCHIVE
◆ CASE FILEThe facts, corroborated

The Carol and Helen Thomas Case

A mother and daughter, Carol and Helen Thomas, described an abduction experience at Birmingham in 1988, including a solid object they said was neither helicopter nor aeroplane. The surviving material is damaged and the archive's file for this case is mixed with another. This is the record such as it is, not a verdict on what happened to them.

EVENT DATE
1988–1989
LOCATION
Birmingham · UK
COORDS
52.49°N 1.85°W
INDEPENDENCE
L3 · MULTI-SOURCE
SOURCES
2 distinct
CLAIMANTS
5
STATUS
Multi-source testimony
VIEW ON ATLAS →

Carol Thomas and her daughter Helen described an abduction experience at Birmingham in 1988. What survives of their account is short. They reported watching a solid object which, they said, was not a helicopter and not an aeroplane. The only time recorded is 5.35 in the morning, attached to a reference to being in the bathroom. That is close to the whole of it.

What is on the record

This is one of the thinner files in the archive and it has a specific problem worth naming. The transcript carrying the Thomases' own account is largely corrupted, which is why the summary of it runs to a few lines rather than a narrative. The detail that would let a reader judge the case is simply gone.

The second telling attached to this canonical does not describe the same event. It reports numerous residents and police officers seeing football-shaped blinking lights that changed colour, and a police department taking thirty to forty calls about them. The department is named as Trussville, a name that does not belong to Birmingham in the West Midlands. Two of the archive's five claimants for this case, Louise Lee and Roger Kohler, belong to that other account rather than to the Thomases'. The claimant list is not clean, and the two tellings should not be read as corroborating one another.

The archive holds no documents here of any class. There is no investigation file, no police record, no photograph. The dating is also loose, bracketed across 1988 and 1989 with 1988 as the better estimate.

Why it sits where it does

The case carries the L3 label for independent claimants, and on inspection that label is doing more work than the material supports. It counts two tellings from two channels, but those tellings are about different events in different places. What the record actually holds is a mother and daughter's brief and damaged account of one night, plus a separate lights-and-police report filed alongside it. What happened at Birmingham in 1988 is not resolved here, and this entry needs its sourcing untangled before it can be.

◆ CORROBORATION
2 independent video sources across 2 channels
5 resolved claimants
◆ SOURCES

Everything this file draws on, in the open — reports, not reality. Check us.

Watch — the tellings

Each opens the source video at the exact moment this case is covered.

Eyes On Cinema Preston Dennett
ABDUCTIONNIGHT LIGHTS1988UNITED KINGDOM

CASE FILES STATE THE RECORD AS OUR ARCHIVE HOLDS IT — FACTS, NOT OPINION. REPORTS, NOT REALITY.

◆ CONTINUE READING