The Swiss contactee Eduard Meier reported that he was shot at around four in the morning at a place called Saddle Egg, and that the bullet struck a metal plate he had put under his jacket after three warning dreams. The archive carries no date for it. This is the record of what was claimed, not a verdict on what happened that morning.
The claim is specific and it is unusual. Eduard Meier, known as Billy, said that in the week beforehand he was warned three times in dreams and shown the exact spot on his body where he would be shot. He put a metal plate under his jacket. At about four in the morning at Saddle Egg in Switzerland a shot struck the plate, dented it and glanced off. Meier says he returned fire and shot the hat from the head of the man running away. This is not a sighting entry. It is an account of an attempt on the life of a man whose wider claims sit elsewhere in the archive.
What is on the record
The archive resolves four claimants: Meier himself, Hans and Konrad Schutzbach, and a fourth listed as Chocobus. One video on one channel carries the entire file. There are no documents at all. No police report, no ballistic examination, no medical note, no photograph of the plate that is central to the story.
That absence does the work here. The account turns on a physical artefact and on an assailant, and both are exactly the kind of thing a record could test. Neither is tested in anything the archive holds. The dented plate is described rather than produced. The shooter is unidentified. Nothing in the file establishes that a shot was fired, only that Meier and those around him say one was.
The dating is missing entirely. The fact sheet carries no year at either end, so the incident cannot be placed relative to anything else, and the location resolves only to country level. The three claimants beside Meier are people connected to him rather than independent observers, which means the four names do not amount to four separate lines of sourcing.
Why it sits where it does
The entry grades L3 on the number of claimants attached to one connected event. That level measures how the sourcing is spread, not whether the account is true, and here the spread is narrow. What the record holds is a claim made by a contactee and repeated by his associates, carried by a single channel and unsupported by any document. What happened at Saddle Egg is not resolved here.
◆ CORROBORATION
✓4 resolved claimants
◆ SOURCES
Everything this file draws on, in the open — reports, not reality. Check us.
Watch — the tellings
Each opens the source video at the exact moment this case is covered.
