Amy Rylance is said to have been taken from her living room on a beam of light while a friend watched, and found again hundreds of kilometres away in north Queensland. The two accounts the archive holds disagree about how long she was gone. This is the record of what was claimed, not a verdict on what happened to her.
The account begins in a house in Queensland. Amy Rylance was asleep in the living room. Her friend Petra, the accounts say, saw her carried out through the window on a beam of light towards a large craft above the house, and fainted. Her husband Keith called the police. Rylance was later found several hundred kilometres north of where she had been. The archive holds no date for any of this and not even a year.
What is on the record
Two tellings on two channels resolve to three claimants: Rylance, Petra and Keith. The two versions agree on the shape of the event and disagree on its measurements. One puts the distance at eight hundred kilometres and the time at three hours. The other puts it at seven hundred and ninety kilometres, has her found at a petrol station, and reports her saying she spent five to seven days aboard with a figure she described as a man. A gap between three hours and a week is not a rounding error. The second version handles it by suggesting travel backwards through time. The archive records the discrepancy rather than resolving it.
Physical evidence is claimed but not held. The accounts mention a torn curtain and a singed bush at the house, and marks on Rylance said to be from procedures done to her. None of that is in the file. It is described in the telling, and description is all the archive has.
There are no documents, no police paperwork despite the reported call, and no photographs. The case is entirely testimony, and much of it is Rylance's own testimony relayed through interviewers.
Why it sits where it does
The case grades L3 because more than one person is named as a claimant to a connected event, chiefly Petra as a witness to the taking. It has no documentary corroboration and no authenticated imagery, so it does not climb. The absence of a date at all is a real weakness of this entry. What happened to Amy Rylance is not resolved here.
◆ CORROBORATION
✓2 independent video sources across 2 channels
✓3 resolved claimants
◆ SOURCES
Everything this file draws on, in the open — reports, not reality. Check us.
Watch — the tellings
Each opens the source video at the exact moment this case is covered.
