A Quebec mother says she was taken aboard a craft, shown a child, and told the child would be her daughter. She says the girl was later born and was the child she had seen. A second woman is said to have referenced the same names independently. This is the record of what has been claimed, not a verdict on any of it.
The claim is unusually specific. That specificity is what draws attention to it and also what the record cannot follow up. A wealthy Quebec mother says she was taken aboard a spaceship into a round room occupied by women who seemed robotic to her. She says Jesus introduced her there to her future daughter. That daughter, Lily, was later born, she says, and matched the child she had been shown. The account extends to a drawing of Lily said to have matched a photograph held by a Montreal police officer. It extends further to a second abductee named Emily who is said to have independently referenced Lily, Sarah, the number 444 and Mary Magdalene.
What is on the record
One telling, one channel, four resolved claimants. That is everything. There are no documents, no photographs and no report in the file. The claimants are the mother, a friend of hers, Emily and the police officer. None is named in the archive except Emily by first name and city.
Two problems sit in the record itself. The drawing described as the corroborating object is attributed in the file to a Sarah who is not among the resolved claimants, so the archive cannot say whose drawing was matched against whose photograph. And the independence of the second account is the whole strength of the claim while also being the part with nothing behind it. The archive holds the assertion that Emily referenced the same names without prior contact. It does not hold anything that would show she did.
The word corroboration appears in the case title. On the evidence held it describes the claim rather than the file.
Why it sits where it does
The case carries an L3 grade on claimant count. That measures how many people the account resolves to rather than whether they can be checked against each other. Everything reaches the archive through a single channel and a single telling. What the mother experienced is not resolved here.
◆ CORROBORATION
✓4 resolved claimants
◆ SOURCES
Everything this file draws on, in the open — reports, not reality. Check us.
Watch — the tellings
Each opens the source video at the exact moment this case is covered.
